Age of Housing

The Age of Housing indicator measures the proportion of neighborhood housing built before 1980. Tenured housing, before 1980, is more likely to be less energy efficient, and have environmental toxins such as asbestos and lead-based paint. Except in areas that have gentrified or are undergoing revitalization with significant housing rehabilitation, homes built before 1980 also tend to be a significant predictor of housing inadequacy (i.e., housing with moderate or severe housing hazards), which includes problems such as water leaks, roof problems, holes in walls, etc. This can increase exposure to mold, mites, and other allergens. The age of a structure is also a significant predictor of higher household lead dust levels and cockroach allergens, which play an important role in the development and exacerbation of respiratory conditions. Studies show that while more institutional factors, such as segregation and income inequalities are difficult to combat, housing interventions can be a more effective and efficient method to address health and economic outcomes. Listed in the Housing domain, the Age of Housing indicator also impacts the Economic Health, Health Systems and Public Safety, and Educational Opportunities domains. It is considered an “inverse” measure in that, the higher the proportion of older housing in a neighborhood, the higher the negative impact on community health. Data on when housing was built is available from the U.S. Census.

Neighborhoodsort descending Indicator Value Rank
Acipco-Finley 74.7% 30
Airport Highlands 93.7% 92
Apple Valley 54.8% 8
Arlington - West End 81.3% 40
Belview Heights 88.7% 68
Bridlewood 55.4% 9
Brown Springs 90.2% 76
Brownsville Heights 93.3% 91
Brummitt Heights 74.6% 27
Bush Hills 92.7% 88
Central City 42.1% 3
Central Park 85.7% 53
Central Pratt 87.7% 64
College Hills 97.0% 99
Collegeville 96.4% 98
Crestline 79.9% 38
Crestwood North 90.5% 78
Crestwood South 84.8% 51
Dolomite 66.7% 15
Druid Hills 85.7% 53
East Avondale 83.0% 46
East Birmingham 86.0% 57
East Brownville 72.2% 24
East Lake 74.6% 27
East Thomas 89.7% 75
Eastwood 72.0% 22
Echo Highlands 44.5% 5
Enon Ridge 89.6% 74
Ensley 79.1% 35
Ensley Highlands 92.3% 86
Evergreen 84.3% 50
Fairmont 92.6% 87
Fairview 91.6% 84
Five Points South 69.4% 17
Forest Park 78.1% 34
Fountain Heights 70.5% 18
Garden Highlands 83.8% 49
Gate City 90.7% 81
Germania Park 87.0% 61
Glen Iris 65.1% 14
Grasselli Heights 91.9% 85
Graymont 94.3% 95
Green Acres 89.0% 70
Harriman Park 94.2% 94
Highland Park 81.2% 39
Hillman 85.9% 56
Hillman Park 70.6% 20
Hooper City 90.7% 81
Huffman 81.3% 40
Industrial Center 94.1% 93
Inglenook 94.3% 95
Jones Valley 92.9% 89
Killough Springs 72.0% 22
Kingston 95.8% 97
Liberty Highlands 60.2% 10
Maple Grove 64.9% 13
Mason City 70.5% 18
North Avondale 87.8% 65
North Birmingham 72.4% 25
North East Lake 86.8% 60
North Pratt 51.5% 6
North Titusville 82.8% 45
Norwood 90.5% 78
Oak Ridge 85.6% 52
Oak Ridge Park 83.2% 48
Oakwood Place 88.1% 67
Overton 12.7% 2
Oxmoor 11.9% 1
Penfield Park 64.6% 12
Pine Knoll Vista 74.6% 27
Powderly 90.9% 83
Redmont Park 83.0% 46
Riley 88.7% 68
Rising - West Princeton 82.3% 43
Roebuck 90.5% 78
Roebuck Springs 93.1% 90
Roosevelt 89.5% 72
Sandusky 54.4% 7
Sherman Heights 82.3% 43
Smithfield 90.2% 76
Smithfield Estates 60.5% 11
South East Lake 81.3% 40
South Pratt 86.4% 59
South Titusville 86.3% 58
South Woodlawn 69.3% 16
Southside 77.6% 32
Spring Lake 74.0% 26
Sun Valley 77.7% 33
Tarpley City 87.8% 65
Thomas 79.1% 35
Tuxedo 44.1% 4
Wahouma 89.3% 71
West Brownville 79.1% 35
West End Manor 87.6% 62
West Goldwire 85.7% 53
Woodland Park 89.5% 72
Woodlawn 77.1% 31
Wylam 87.6% 62
Zion City 71.9% 21

Key Citations:
1. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Social Determinants of Health. Published 2011. Accessed December 27, 2013. Available at: http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/issue_briefs/2011/rwjf70451.
2. Elliott L, Arbes S, Harvey ES, Lee RC, Salo PM, Cohn RD, London SJ, Zeldin DC. Dust Weight and Asthma Prevalence in the National Survey of Lead and Allergens in Housing (NSLAH). Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115(2): 215–220. Published online 2006 November 7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9412 PMCID: PMC1817708.
3. Cohn RD, Arbes SJ, Jaramillo R, Reid, LH, Zeldin, DC. 2006. National Prevalence and Exposure Risk for Cockroach Allergen in U.S. Households. Environ Health Perspect. 2006; 114(4): 522–526. Published online 2005 November 15. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8561.
4. Lefebvre S, Montgomery P, Michel I, Warren C, Larose T, Kauppi C. The role of public health inspectors in maintaining housing in northern and rural communities: recommendations to support public health practice. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;103(2):84-9.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Healthy Housing Reference Manual. 2006. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nceh/publication/books/housing/housing.htm
6. National Center for Healthy Housing. Housing Interventions and Health: A Review of the Evidence. 2009. Accessed December 27, 2012. Available at: www.nchh.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=2lvaEDNBldU%3d%tabid=229.