Commute Mode Share

Commute mode share indicates how people choose to get to work. The Commute Mode Share indicator measures how many neighborhood residents commute to work via public transit, walking, biking, or carpool. These alternatives to driving alone help to combat congestion which leads to better air quality. In Birmingham, the average commuter wastes 32 hours per year in traffic and 21 gallons of fuel due to congestion. A byproduct is an increase in ground-level ozone and particle pollution, which is harmful to health, especially for children, the elderly, outdoor workers and those with respiratory conditions such as asthma. This further underscores the importance of alternative commutes, especially when regular transit riders are more likely to meet physical activity guidelines and have lower rates of obesity than non-transit riders as they walk or bike to transportation hubs, and carpool riders are more likely to walk or bike for non-commute trips during the day. Listed under the Transportation Services domain, the Commute Mode Share indicator is also tied to the Neighborhood Characteristics, Economic Health, Health Systems and Public Safety, and Employment Opportunities domains. Data is available from the U.S. Census.

Neighborhoodsort ascending Indicator Value Rank
Zion City 6.0% 92
Wylam 15.7% 52
Woodlawn 20.2% 36
Woodland Park 8.8% 85
West Goldwire 25.9% 20
West End Manor 18.3% 42
West Brownville 10.1% 76
Wahouma 20.4% 34
Tuxedo 25.8% 21
Thomas 23.7% 25
Tarpley City 25.3% 23
Sun Valley 11.8% 70
Spring Lake 5.3% 94
Southside 32.2% 8
South Woodlawn 39.5% 4
South Titusville 12.4% 63
South Pratt 12.2% 64
South East Lake 21.3% 31
Smithfield Estates 5.2% 95
Smithfield 58.8% 1
Sherman Heights 9.1% 82
Sandusky 14.5% 56
Roosevelt 11.6% 73
Roebuck Springs 12.5% 62
Roebuck 13.1% 59
Rising - West Princeton 48.6% 3
Riley 12.1% 67
Redmont Park 9.1% 82
Powderly 28.0% 16
Pine Knoll Vista 9.4% 79
Penfield Park 12.1% 67
Oxmoor 8.3% 87
Overton 4.0% 98
Oakwood Place 25.1% 24
Oak Ridge Park 13.2% 58
Oak Ridge 5.8% 93
Norwood 27.6% 17
North Titusville 21.4% 30
North Pratt 8.5% 86
North East Lake 18.9% 40
North Birmingham 22.7% 29
North Avondale 48.9% 2
Mason City 29.7% 11
Maple Grove 12.2% 64
Liberty Highlands 15.0% 55
Kingston 20.3% 35
Killough Springs 6.4% 91
Jones Valley 23.4% 26
Inglenook 14.4% 57
Industrial Center 28.3% 15
Huffman 16.3% 50
Hooper City 15.4% 53
Hillman Park 12.1% 67
Hillman 15.9% 51
Highland Park 7.7% 88
Harriman Park 7.0% 89
Green Acres 16.6% 47
Graymont 16.6% 47
Grasselli Heights 5.0% 97
Glen Iris 11.7% 72
Germania Park 20.8% 33
Gate City 17.8% 44
Garden Highlands 25.4% 22
Fountain Heights 30.2% 10
Forest Park 9.9% 77
Five Points South 29.4% 12
Fairview 7.0% 89
Fairmont 17.1% 45
Evergreen 29.4% 12
Ensley Highlands 22.8% 27
Ensley 22.8% 27
Enon Ridge 31.3% 9
Echo Highlands 10.8% 74
Eastwood 9.9% 77
East Thomas 18.0% 43
East Lake 15.2% 54
East Brownville 11.8% 70
East Birmingham 12.7% 61
East Avondale 16.5% 49
Druid Hills 26.3% 19
Dolomite 10.6% 75
Crestwood South 8.9% 84
Crestwood North 9.3% 81
Crestline 2.9% 99
Collegeville 36.2% 5
College Hills 18.8% 41
Central Pratt 32.5% 7
Central Park 33.5% 6
Central City 29.1% 14
Bush Hills 21.0% 32
Brummitt Heights 9.4% 79
Brownsville Heights 19.9% 38
Brown Springs 12.9% 60
Bridlewood 5.1% 96
Belview Heights 16.8% 46
Arlington - West End 19.2% 39
Apple Valley 12.2% 64
Airport Highlands 20.2% 36
Acipco-Finley 26.6% 18

Key Citations:
1. Edwards J. Public transit, obesity, and medical costs: assessing the magnitudes. Preventive Medicine. 2008;46:14-21.
2. MacDonald JM et al. The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010; 39(2):105-112.
3. http://commutesmart.org/birmingham/.